It’s important that landlords understand the legal requirements and options when using Non-Housing Act agreements. In this blog post, we’ll explain what Non-Housing Act agreements are, the legal requirements for using them, the pros and cons of using them, and alternative agreements that landlords can use.

Understanding Non-Housing Act agreements

Non-Housing Act agreements are tenancy agreements that are not covered by the Housing Act 1988. They differ from standard assured shorthold tenancy agreements in that they are used for tenancies that do not fall within the scope of the Act. Non-Housing Act agreements cover a wide range of tenancies, including licences, lodgers, and commercial leases. They may be used in situations where a standard assured shorthold tenancy agreement is not appropriate, such as when one of the following applies:

• When the Tenants are not individuals but a company or a charity
• An arrangement where the tenant has agreed to use the property for short-term residential use, such as a holiday let
• A tenancy where the tenant will use the property for a business purpose
• A tenancy that lasts for less than six months
• Tenancies where tenants do not have exclusive possession of the property, such as when the landlord resides in the property.
• Tenancies where the annual rent is over £100,000.

Free Landlord Resources

Legal requirements for Non-Housing Act agreements

Landlords must adhere to certain legal requirements when using Non-Housing Act agreements. These include providing a written agreement that sets out the terms of the tenancy, adhering to the terms of the agreement, and ensuring that the agreement is fair and reasonable. Failure to comply with these requirements can result in legal action and financial penalties.

Pros and cons of Non-Housing Act agreements

Non-Housing Act agreements can offer greater flexibility, lower costs, and fewer legal restrictions than standard assured shorthold tenancy agreements. However, they also have potential drawbacks, such as the lack of tenant protections, reduced legal recourse, and increased risk of disputes. Landlords should carefully consider these pros and cons before entering an arrangement where a Non-Housing Act agreement is necessary. 

Alternatives to Non-Housing Act agreements

Landlords may consider using alternative agreements, such as standard assured shorthold tenancy agreements or commercial leases. These agreements have different legal requirements, protections, and limitations than Non-Housing Act agreements. For example, standard assured shorthold tenancy agreements offer greater tenant protections, but also have more legal restrictions than Non-Housing Act agreements.

Conclusion

Non-Housing Act agreements are an important option for landlords, though they do come with legal requirements and potential risks. It’s essential for landlords to understand these requirements and options, and to seek professional legal advice and guidance when using Non-Housing Act agreements. By doing so, landlords can ensure compliance with the law and protect their interests.

Free Landlord Resources